DynaWM: A Base-VLA-Guided World Foundation Model for Moving-Object Manipulation
arXiv:2607.02604v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Although vision-language-action (VLA) models have received widespread attention, many challenges remain in manipulating dynamic moving objects. In most existing approaches, end-to-end forward or inverse dynamics models, i.e., world models, are incorporated into high-performance base VLA architectures, which may degrade the performance of well-pretrained base VLA models due to inappropriate fine-tuning. In this paper, we propose DynaWM, a base-VL
Overview
arXiv:2607.02604v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Although vision-language-action (VLA) models have received widespread attention, many challenges remain in manipulating dynamic moving objects. In most existing approaches, end-to-end forward or inverse dynamics models, i.e., world models, are incorporated into high-performance base VLA architectures, which may degrade the performance of well-pretrained base VLA models due to inappropriate fine-tuning. In this paper, we propose DynaWM, a base-VLA-guided world foundation model that adapts to a wide variety of fine-tuned and coarse-tuned base-VLA checkpoints for moving-object manipulation. DynaWM uses a Mamba-3-based action encoder to encode the base action chunk produced by the base VLA into an action-conditioning representation, a V-JEPA 2.1 vision encoder to extract features from multi-view observation history, and a proprioceptive state encoder to encode robotic-arm proprioceptive states. These feature representations jointly condition a flow-matching DiT to regenerate motion-aware action trajectories for moving-object manipulation. For systematic evaluation, we construct the DynaGrasp-32 benchmark, covering six categories of moving-object manipulation tasks, including velocity variation, trajectory variation, and multi-object manipulation, as well as the DynaGrasp-1600 dataset, which consists of 32 scenarios, 1,600 demonstration trajectories, and approximately 1.53M images. For fine-tuned base-VLA checkpoints, DynaWM achieves percentage improvements of 7.19, 45.31, 1.88, and 10.94 over SmolVLA, X-VLA, {\pi}0, and {\pi}0.5, respectively. For coarse-tuned base-VLA checkpoints, performance increases by 35.13, 44.06, 35.69, and 26.13 percentage, respectively. Ablation experiments show that visual encoding enhances success by 27.50%, while reducing success by 45.44% if action conditioning is removed.
Source
Originally published at arxiv.org.
Related Articles
Source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02604
